Carl Spackler, Take One
Comments here and at Jennifer’s place have netted two suggestions for mole “control”: a fine looking spring-loaded spike system (ignore the domain name in that link) and powdered fox pee urine.
|
Positives on the spikes: 1 - evil-looking 2 - retains evidence of effectiveness … |
Negatives on the spikes: 1 - might impale other stuff 2 - gotta mail-order it |
|
Positives on the feral cat 1 - It’s a powdered liquid, which is always good for a brain-teaser. 2 - While we’re brain-teasing, how do they collect this stuff? I want to support whoever’s job that is, just out of sympathy and the hope that they might invite me to come observe the process some day. 3 - It’s called “rodent powder” - as though reconstituting it would result in rodents, and not sewage. |
Negatives on the evaporated feline excretions: 1 - gotta mail-order it. 2 - no direct evidence of effictiveness. Gotta wait and see. |
All of which leads, clearly, to chewing gum:

I read on the Internet that if you poke Juicy Fruit gum (not just any gum) into the trails of the moles, the moles go away. I have been unable to gain clarity on exactly how this works, but it offers the following advantages:
1 - Inexpensive.
2 - This is not gum’s intended purpose.
3 - Wrigley’s is from Chicago, and therefore deserves my support.
4 - This will be funnier than the other options if it works.
These outweigh the fact that this method comes with the same downside as the cat drippings: no body.
Ten pieces poked into the tunnels (which are more extensive than I last checked. My whole backyard is squishy.)
Here we go, mole.






I’ve never heard of that one but let me know how it works. Sounds like it may provide the tangible reward of bodies, if they die from getting gummed up. I especially liked the columnist’s warning never to swallow whole moles, lest you die of molestation like the seagull did…how utterly disgusting!
Comment by gwynne — December 23, 2006 @ 2:14 pm